3 ½ stars
"The Earth is evil. We don't need to grieve for it. No one will
miss it." (Justine)
Lars
von Trier and his style are quite peculiar, that's why either you love it or
hate it, in some degree, you will be biased anyway. I must say right at the
beginning that his films are not exactly my cup of tea but at the same time I
can't negate their artistic value. For sure, to make 'Melancholia' look like it
looks is a tremendous challenge. But to watch it is an absolutely opposite
experience. What I'm trying to say is that Lars von Trier invested a lot of his
talent and vision into this picture, working hard, while beholding his
cinematic child is a rather easy pleasant experience; not a five star one though.
What's the story?
I
won't put it better than IMDb, so: "Two sisters find their already
strained relationship challenged as a mysterious new planet threatens to
collide into the Earth." Indeed, 'Melancholia' mostly deals with anxieties
and inner collisions of Justine (Kirsten Dunst) and Claire (Charlotte
Gainsbourg).
Was it made look good (by those who work in pre- and
post-production or behind the camera)?
Have
you seen the poster? (Apparently, if you're reading this review.) Isn't it
beautiful? The film is just the same. It is visually gorgeous, set against picturesque
Swedish background at first and approaching cosmic menace later. Occasional slomo
effect and powerful music as we observe the images from Lars von Trier's mind
is the best way to affect the audience. Camerawork is astounding; while I'm not
sure about other nominations, I will be very surprised if it doesn't get an
Oscar nod for cinematography.
What about acting?
Kirsten
Dunst won the Best Actress award at the Cannes festival and for some good
reasons, and I loved her portrayal of Justine starting with the very first scene
of the film for her character is extremely many-sided. What amazed me the most
is her heroine's humility before the inevitable, which I can explain with the
help of two words: beautiful acting. Charlotte Gainsboourg doesn't drop behind
her co-star. Playing onscreen sisters, they both are so different, which is
superbly expressed at the end of the film, what I found fascinating and
meaningful. The rest of the cast forms a knockout cocktail of fantastic actors,
like Charlotte Rampling, John Hurt, Kiefer Sutherland, Stellan Skarsgard, Alexander
Skarsgard, and Brady Cobert. Some of them have really small parts, but it
doesn't seem that their characters are underused, probably, because the story
openly focuses on the sisters, and it feels so right to "ignore"
other characters.
What did it make me feel?
That's
the most important question. I loved the beginning. I loved the ending. They
were mesmerizing and beautiful. However, the middle of the film fell short in
my vision. There is no way to describe it all without spoilers, so I won't.
Besides, it's better to see it with your own eyes. (And please, if you are still
deciding whether to see it on the big screen or later at home, read the next
paragraph.) Another point that I liked was the depiction of the pre-apocalypse atmosphere
in an isolated location. There were no herds of people, crying about their fate
and trying to save themselves in a pointless crush; there were no trivialities;
there were just a few personalities living out the tragedy of their world collapsing.
That's why this film is very personal and feels real.
Any chance of re-visiting?
A
very vague chance because this movie is better to see on big screen, so I wouldn’t
re-watch it at home. Believe me, to enjoy the images, the sound (at some
points, it is astounding, making you believe that the alien planet is ready to
crush down the Earth) to the full it is better to go to the theater.
Conclusion
Although
'Melancholia' is one beautiful phantom and is Lars von Trier to his best, it
doesn't work out for me as I hoped it would. However, the epilogue of the story
is profound and satisfying.
What
are your thoughts? If you have been lucky to see it already, did you like it?
If not, do you want to see it? Will you watch it in the cinema or at home? What
do you think it can offer you?





Lovely review, Lesya. I've never been a fan of von Trier so his films are rarely on my radar, but I might give it a rent based on your review. That last picture is stunning, no doubt the film is just as gorgeous. Somehow when I saw your tweet that you didn't love it you'd give it a lower rating :D
ReplyDeleteI really want to see this film. I have only seen Breaking the Waves from Von Trier's filmography, and loved it thoroughly. If this is anything like that, and I get the feeling that Dunst's character's a bit like Emily Watson's in Breaking the Waves, then definitely count me in.
ReplyDeleteExcellent review Lesya. I love how you did it without using any spoilers. Those images are stunning, and although I'm pretty sure at this point that this isn't the film of the year, I still can't wait to see it on the big screen.
ReplyDeleteThis is one of the films of 2011 I'm dying to see because of von Trier. Having experienced depression last year, I wanted to know how von Trier approached this film as it's the second part of his "Depression" trilogy. Excellent work as always.
ReplyDeleteGreat review, Lesya. Really puts my one to shame - I guess I may have explained a little too much, but that just shows how bad I am at writing reviews!
ReplyDeleteI think I'll probably revisit this one, but probably on the big screen (whenever it actually comes out), as that allows you to feel everything in this movie as much as possible. It was such a gorgeous film.
And that end...I was pretty shaken by that!
I see you put up your rating, too. As soon as I left the cinema, I was prepared to give it a 5, but during the long drive home I put it down to 3.5, haha
I find Von Trier's directing really pretentious, but I think I'm going to give this a shot. I've loved Kirsten Dunst ever since I was a child. She was my idol. I also love looking at Alexander Skarsgard, lol.
ReplyDeleteThanks everyone!
ReplyDelete@ruth, I didn't love it but I don't deny it was gorgeous. In fact, as I digested it, I thought better of this film :)
@Nikhat, I only saw Dogville before, so I can't tell about Breaking Waves. However, if you liked it and von Trier's style, Melancholia may be just for you.
@BT, oh thanks! I always try to write spoiler-free reviews, although at first I totally failed at that :) I will be looking forward to your review; I'm pretty sure that if you see it in theater, you'll write one.
@thevoid99, really? What are the first two movies? I heard that he wanted to direct a sequel to Dogville and Manderlay but I don't see Melancholia in the same set. I hope you're okay now.
@Stevee, it's not true! I loved your review and although I noticed that you gave away more than I did, there were no spoilers. Actually, I thought that your more detailed review puts to shame mine. So that's how it is :) Yes, I've changed the rating because indeed some films affect me more as time passes. And I really thought better of it the next day after I saw it.
@Brittani, I like Kirsten. Maybe it's not her best film (in my view), but the part is definitely the most prominent in her career.
i still need to see this. i like kirsetn dunst, even though this movie looks very pretentious. i liked your summation though. and i love the new design of your blog!
ReplyDeleteWell, I'm doing all right now, thank you for the comment.
ReplyDeleteThere was supposed to be a follow up to Manderlay called Wasington. What happened was that because of a creative crisis with the Danish film industry which led to some big flops that included Dear Wendy which he wrote. Von Trier was forced to abandon the project so there won't be a third part of the USA-Land of Opportunities trilogy for now. That's a real disappointment for me because I wanted to know what happens to Grace in the third film.
This "Depression" trilogy of Antichrist, Melancholia, and the upcoming The Nymphomaniac is all about von Trier's exploration with depression as the last one is about the sexual awakening of a woman set for 2013. Of course, Lars von Trier in all of his witty comments and bad boy persona puts my ass in the seat.
@Candice, I don't know what's gotten into me, so that I used this gaudy background lol. As for the film, it's pretentious as hell, but it doesn't mean that it doesn't deserve a shot.
ReplyDelete@thevoid99, thanks for the explanation. Quite illuminating for I'm not very well acquainted with his work. Although von Trier seems as an interesting filmmaker (duh), I don't feel I can handle all of his films... like Antichrist. Not that I'm afraid to watch that. I'm just so not interested now.
Europe trilogy:
ReplyDelete•The Element of Crime
•Epidemic
•Europa(Zentropa in U.S.)
Golden Heart trilogy:
•Breaking The Waves
•The Idiots
•Dancer in the Dark
Land of Opportunities trilogy:
•Dogville
•Manderlay
•Wasington(cancelled so far)
Depression trilogy:
•Antichrist
•Melancholia
•Nymphomaniac(in production)
Whoever you are, thanks a lot.
ReplyDeleteI think that someday the time comes, when I decide to examine von Trier's filmography in detail, so it'll be helpful. Why don't they have such thing on IMDb?
Thank you!
I saw the film last night and I have to agree, I have not been able to get the mesmerizing beauty of the beginning and ending out of my mind, and the artistry of the film was breathtaking at times. The music, too, was wonderful, and the acting was excellent. However, as to what I think of the film as a whole... it is very difficult to say, and I think I still need time to contemplate it. It certainly does give one a lot to ponder... and I will never look at the moon the same way again.
ReplyDelete@Anonymous, now, as time has passed, I look at the film with a little bit different percpective. I have an urge to see it once again because it is quite multi-layered, and it takes time and re-visiting to understand all the complexity and depth the director wanted to convey.
ReplyDelete